Fair play study 2021: Serious gaps in knowledge of occupational retirement provision

Back to overview
Share article

Fair play study 2021: Serious gaps in knowledge of occupational retirement provision

Did you know that your pension fund balance belongs to you alone – just like capital in a restricted pension plan? No? Then you are in good company: The majority of people in Switzerland are unaware of this fact. This surprising statistic emerges from a recent study by research institute Sotomo on behalf of Vita – occupational retirement provision.
New study: Serious gaps in knowledge of occupational retirement provision
This gap in knowledge has consequences: Many savers have no problem with the fact that almost half of investment income on their pension fund balance is redistributed. After all, they don't know that it is their own money. Several billion is redistributed annually – contrary to the basic principle of the second pillar. The money is passed from the working population to people who are now retired. This is because what they were once promised can now only be financed in this way. It is evident that this approach has major financial consequences for the current working population: The income that is currently being diverted will not be available to them when they are old.

The consequences of financial difficulties in occupational retirement provision

As the most important element of retirement provision, occupational retirement provision has for a long time faced major challenges. This is because promised pensions can no longer be funded from the retirement savings capital accumulated by individuals who are now retired. There are three reasons for this:

  • First, people now grow considerably older than in the years when occupational retirement provision came about.
  • Second, there have been extremely low interest rates for more than ten years, meaning that returns are much lower. As a result, interest, as the "third contribution provider" alongside employees and employers, is no longer fit for purpose.
  • Third, rigid legal requirements are leading to excessive guarantees – in the form of conversion rates that are too high and unrealistic interest rate pledges. Pension funds are forced to fund these through a considerable portion of the working population's investment income, which is redistributed in favor of retired persons.

BVG in difficulties – yet the population remains calm. Why?

Occupational retirement provision is in difficulties and the status quo is being maintained at the expense of the future. Why has there not yet been any major outcry from the population? Renowned research institute Sotomo looked into this question on behalf of Vita, surveying a representative group of 1,608 people between the ages of 18 and 79 – and receiving interesting responses:

1. Your pension fund balance forms part of your assets - but many people are unaware of this

The majority of the working population do not know that their pension fund balance belongs to them: Only 44% of the Swiss population count their pension fund balance toward their own assets. This means that the majority are unaware of this fact. Why is this? One reason could be that pension fund contributions are deducted directly from a person's salary and are not declared as assets on tax returns. It is probably for this reason that many are unaware that the money continues to belong to them. Another factor is that only one in six people surveyed knew exactly how high their own pension fund balance was at present or would be in the future.

"Only 44% know that their pension fund balance counts as part of their own assets."

2. The conversion rate is incorrectly understood

Most of those surveyed perceive a possible drop in the conversion rate as the greatest risk for their future pensions. In fact, it is the exact opposite: Because the conversion rate has not yet been lowered, a significant portion of the investment income of the working population currently has to be redistributed to retired persons.

3. Retirement provision is not a major topic

Young adults (between the ages of 18 and 25) in particular rarely consider the issue of personal retirement provision. Less than one in three (29%) thinks about this. But more than half of young adults are worried about their income in old age. The combination of a lack of knowledge and a sense of uneasiness cripples them: They sense that something is going wrong but understand too little to demand concrete changes.

"Only 29% of young adults consider their retirement provision. The remainder ignore the topic."

4. Redistribution is not recognized as a problem

Almost half of those surveyed (48%) think that redistribution in the second pillar is fair – as they are not aware that the system is conceived differently and the money actually belongs to them. If this fact were known, greater political pressure would arise – this is the belief of four out of five people (78%). These figures show how important it is to explain how occupational retirement provision works and to contextualize current developments. Yet only those who understand correlations can form a sound opinion.

5. Retain or change?

According to the Fair play study, the guaranteed pensions in the present BVG are the main reason for the positive assessment of redistribution: Many of those surveyed hope that they too will subsequently benefit from redistribution thanks to fixed pensions. But this hope may prove deceptive. After all, the ratio of working people to retired people will continue to worsen in coming years. The pyramid with many contribution payers below and a few retired people above is showing a trend for developing into a rectangle. There is thus a huge risk that the pyramid system will reach its limits. The current working population would then be penalized twice over: Almost half of their own income on their pension fund balance is currently being redistributed. However they themselves will not benefit from this redistribution in future to the same extent – if at all.

6. Pensions with a variable portion as an opportunity

Over one in three people surveyed would choose a pension with a variable portion and lower guarantees. Young adults in particular could benefit significantly from this. Due to lower redistribution, they would receive more returns and could simultaneously exploit the compound interest effect optimally thanks to the long term. However, the greatest interest in this is shown by 46- to 55-year-olds – probably because it is this group who have already given greater thought to the correlations of occupational retirement provision.
Pensions are currently fixed and their amount is fully guaranteed. However this is expensive and reduces the potential for returns. A combination of fixed and variable portions could provide an opportunity for occupational retirement provision in the future.

"One in every three working people would like a pension with variable portions."

Conclusion: Greater knowledge for a positive future

Occupational retirement provision is a complex topic – and for most people in Switzerland it is one that they would prefer to stay well clear of. For this reason, many people are unaware that the status quo is being maintained at the expense of the future. This affects the present-day working population very specifically. We have to call attention to these correlations more often – and in a way that ensures that a broad swathe of the population can understand them. This is the only way to achieve a consensus that the reform of occupational retirement provision is necessary. The Fairplay study shows how important this educational work is. Furthermore, it creates hope that better informed people will be more open to modern solutions in order to successfully steer occupational retirement provision into the future.

Frequently asked questions

Why, with a guaranteed pension, am I highly likely to receive less money than with a variable model?

For guaranteed pensions, the pension fund has to invest a large portion of the pension fund balance in a low-risk manner, e.g. in bonds. In the current period of low interest rates, only low or even negative returns can be generated on this capital. So high guarantees reduce the returns on the pension fund balance, and retirement assets increase less strongly.

Even in the event of the same retirement assets at the time of retirement, the variable pension model has greater power and generates significantly higher pension payments on average. After all, retirement assets remain invested even after a pension is drawn and can be invested in a more balanced manner.

What is so bad about redistribution – I will benefit from this later too?

Unfortunately, this is unlikely. Conversion rates will need to fall and are going to. The current working population will be penalized twice over: They are currently losing money thanks to redistribution, but they are unlikely to get this back in future and will also receive a smaller pension thanks to the lower conversion rate.

Why is a high conversion rate bad – it means I get more money, doesn't it?

No, the conversion rate is a percentage that is used to calculate the amount of the pension. Using the comparison of a cake, the conversion rate defines the number of slices of cake, as well as the size of a slice. What is relevant is how much money can be "converted." A high conversion rate is of no use if there is little to convert. At the same time, high conversion rates have to be financed. If there is too little cake available for retired people, this must be redistributed from the investment income of the working population. Current workers are then penalized twice over: They have less money now and in the future, and conversion rates will undoubtedly be lowered subsequently.

Fairplay in occupational retirement provision

Vita is committed to fairplay in occupational retirement provision and provides transparent information on redistribution. Vita also creates future-proof pension products and supports you in choosing the right pension solution for yourself.

Find out more

Associated articles

Fairness rather than redistribution in the second pillar

Fairness rather than redistribution in the second pillar. Part 1: Fairness – what does it mean?

Recently, there has been increased discussion about fairness in occupational retirement provision. Why is this so? And what does fairness mean in this context?
Fairness rather than redistribution in the second pillar

Fairness rather than redistribution in the second pillar. Part 2: What is going wrong in occupational retirement provision?

Occupational retirement provision does not, by design, include a redistribution between generations – but it is nevertheless happening. What are the reasons for this and what impact does it have?
Occupational retirement provision for their employees

Occupational retirement provision: What's the real problem?

Every SME entrepreneur knows: Occupational retirement provision is the most important component of old-age security and risk coverage for their employees. At the same time, the system is coming under increasing pressure and confidence in the second pillar is receding. But what's the real problem?